miércoles, 24 de julio de 2013

السيد نصر الله لأوروبا: قراركم يعني شراكة في أي عدوان.. ولن تجنوا منه سوى الخيبة


أطل الامين العام لحزب الله السيد حسن نصر الله مساء اليوم الاربعاء حيث تحدث في الافطار الذي اقامته اللجنة النسائية في"هيئة دعم المقاومة الاسلامية".

واشار السيد حسن نصر الله الى ان المقاومة دائما في دائرة الاستهداف على كل صعيد لاجل ازالتها وسحقها واعدامها. واكد الامين العام لحزب الله ان هذه المقاومة ستبقى شوكة صلبة في عين الصهاينة وبكل من يريد سوءا بهذا البلد العزيز.
لم يفاجئنا القرار الاوروبي

واكد السيد نصر الله اننا في حزب الله لم يفاجئنا القرار الاوروبي بوضع ما سماه الجناح العسكري لحزب الله على لائحة الارهاب وكنا نتوقعه منذ وقت بعيد والغريب انه تاخر.
وتوجه بالشكر إلى جميع الرؤساء والقيادات الدينية والسياسية والشخصيات والاحزاب والقوى التي رفضت وأدانت القرار الأوروبي مشيرا الى ان الكثير من هذه القيادات وقفت معنا في مثل هذه الايام في حرب تموز.

واشار الى ان الاسرائيليين تحدثوا بوضوح ان القرار نتيجة الجهود "الدبلوماسية" لاسرائيل واعتبروه انتصارا وفرحوا به فرحا شديدا، وقال : اذا كان احد في لبنان يريد ان يفرح بالقرار فليخبئ فرحه لكي لا يكون هو ونتانياهو فرحين في الوقت نفسه.

ولفت الى ان "اسرائيل" واميركا مارسا ضغوطا هائلة على الاتحاد الاوروبي لاتخاذ هذا الموقف، ولا يحتاج الى كثير استدلال ان الاسرائيليين يقفون خلف هذا القرار بالدرجة الاولى والاميركيون معهم ومن كان الاوروبيين من متحمسا للقرار.
هذا القرار يخدم "اسرائيل".. ولماذا لا تصنفون "اسرائيل" ارهابا؟؟

وشدد السيد نصر الله على ان القرار اسرائيلي ويخدم مصلحة "اسرائيل"، واوروبا خضعت وليس اقتنعت (وهذا اسوأ) للادارة الاميركية والاسرائيلية، ودائما لم يكونوا يصلون الى نتيجة عند تدارس هذا القرار ولو كان هناك حجة ومنطق ما كان الموضوع يحتاج سنوات، وهذا يعني ان من داخل الاتحاد الاوروبي من كان يعتبر ان هذا غير قانوني وفي اخر الامر خضع.
واضاف: لم اشعر للحظة ان هذا القرار سيادي بل تم املاؤه على الاوروبيين، وهذا الموقف لا ينسجم لا مع ما تتحدث عنه اوروبا من مبادئ وقيم عندما تصنف مقاومة ارهابا ولا ينسجم مع مصالحها، معتبرا ان هناك من اراد ان يزج بالدول الاوروبية في صراع يخدم مصالحه هو لا مصالحها هي، ومن زجها هو الاسرائيلي ، متسائلا ما مصلحة الدول الاوروبية في قرار ضد مقاومة لها تاييد لبناني وعربي واسع.
وتوجه السيد نصر الله للاتحاد الاوروبي متسائلا لماذا لا تصنفون "اسرائيل" ارهابا او جناحها العسكري اي الجيش وانتم تعترفون ان الجيش في "اسرائيل" يحتل ارضا فلسطينية ولا ينفذ القرارات الدولية والعالم كله شاهد مجازر الاسرائيليين.

 تغطية وشراكة في اي عدوان اسرائيلي على لبنان

واعتبر ان من الواضح ان المقصود من القرار المقاومة اي يقولون ان المقاومة اللبنانية منظمة ارهابية  وهذا امر يسيء للبنان وللشعب والحكومات اللبنانية.
واكد ان هذه الاساءة لن تنال من معنوياتنا وهذه الدول اساءت لنفسها اكثر مما اساءت للمقاومين.
واعلن السيد نصر الله ان هذه الدول تعطي غطاء قانونيا لـ"اسرائيل" من اجل اي عدوان على لبنان لان "اسرائيل" حينئذ تقول اننا نشن حربا على الارهاب والمنشآت والمؤسسات الارهابية وهذه الدول تجعل نفسها شريكا كاملا في اي عدوان على لبنان او المقاومة او اي هدف للمقاومة في لبنان.
واكد الامين العام لحزب الله للاوروبيين انكم لن تحصلوا من هذا القرار الا على الفشل والخيبة ومن يتصور ان المقاومة التي واجهت اقوى جيش في المنطقة على مدى 33 يوما وكانت تنزف دما يمكن ان يخضعها قرار تافه فهو واهم او جاهل، وهذا القرار لن يستطيع ان يحقق ايا من اهدافه، لذلك ندعوهم للعودة عن الخطأ، وقال "هذا القرار بلّوه واشربو ميتو".
لا اموال في البنوك الاوروبية ولا نصيّف في اوروبا
وقال السيد نصر الله: نحن "زعلانين" هذه السنة اننا لن نصيف في سردينيا ولا "نشم الهوا" في مكان ما في الخارج! لا شيء من هذا القبيل، نحن جماعة حتى بالعطلة و"شم الهوا" وطنيون ولبنانيون نصيف في الجنوب او البقاع او الجبل .. و"الفيزا" التي كنتم تعطونهم اياها مباركة عليكم.. وليس لدينا اموال ليس في البنوك الاوروبية بل ليس في اي بنك في الخارج.
لن يستطيع احد توظيف القرار الاوروبي في الداخل وحكومة دون حزب الله لن تتشكل
وتوجه في كلمة للداخل اللبناني معلقا على بيانات ومواقف للفريق الاخر بعد هذا القرار بالقول لن تستطيعوا توظيف هذا القرار في الحسابات السياسية اللبنانية وما قبل القرار مثل ما بعد القرار بالمعادلة الداخلية.

اضاف: امس كان هناك اناس يقولون ان هذا القرار يؤكد انه يجب ان تتشكل حكومة بلا حزب الله في الوقت الذي يقول فيه الاوروبيون انفسهم ان لا مشكلة عندنا ان يشارك حزب الله بحكومة، اذاً هؤلاء  يحمّلون هذا الموقف ما لا يحتمل، طبعا الحكومة بدون حزب الله لن تتشكل هذا منطقي، وانا -على سبيل المزاح- افكر ان اقترح على اخواني ان يكون وزراؤنا في الحكومة المقبلة من الجناح العسكري في حزب الله.
almanar.

jueves, 18 de julio de 2013

Egyptian security arrests a militant of “Free Army” in pro-demonstrations to Morsi.

 Hosam al-Din Malas

One of the members of Free Army militia, called by Hosam al-Din Malas, has been arrested by the security forces in Giza in Egypt.

The security troops have found with him a military uniform and firearms and demanded the prosecution to initiate investigations into the aims of possessing them whether for criminal acts or not.

Some websites have mentioned that Hosam Malas was participating in the supporting demonstration to the ousted president Mohammad Morsi and he was .

Hosam al-Din Malas is the responsible for the blast that targeted the Staff Command Building of the Syrian Army in Damascus.



http://breakingnews.sy/en/article/21398.html

lunes, 15 de julio de 2013

'United Stasi of America': RT's Ruptly team detained filming Anonymous 'United Stasi of America' action



Video: Ruptly

Staff of RT’s video agency Ruptly were detained for several hours by Berlin police while filming the Anonymous 'United Stasi of America' action. Despite the crew having official permission to work in the area, police attempted to confiscate the footage.

The reporters were searched and detained for two hours. Police released the Ruptly team without charges as they found no grounds to seize the memory card with the video.

On July 14, Anonymous activists protested government surveillance programs by beaming giant words reading 'United Stasi of America' across the US embassy wall near the Brandenburg Gate in central Berlin.

The projected note – up to three meters high – made reference to the former East German secret police, the Stasi.

The projection came from the car parked across the embassy and only lasted for two minutes. After that, three Anonymous activists packed up and left the scene.

However, a handful of police proceeded to detain the journalists filming on location.

“The police considered them first as suspects and then as Anonymous conspirators,” Ruptly said.

"Staffers of Ruptly video agency were shooting Anonymous actions and they had all the necessary work permits and accreditation. In this case, any fact of confiscation is illegal, so the Berlin police failed to remove our stuff," said Margarita Simonyan, RT’s editor-in-chief.

In June, German magazine Der Spiegel reported that the US combs through half a billion German phone calls, emails and text messages each month, and has classified Germany on the same target level as China.

Back then Markus Ferber, a member of Chancellor Angela Merkel's Bavarian sister party and member of the European Parliament, accused Washington of using "American-style Stasi methods," thus comparing them to the communist East Germany’s much-dreaded Ministry for State Security (Stasi).

The Stasi secret police employed a network of informants that served as watchdogs against any forms of government dissent. Spies reported the actions of friends and relatives, drilled holes into apartments and hotel rooms to film citizens with hidden cameras, and infiltrated schools and universities. In some cases, spouses and family members spied on each other.

domingo, 14 de julio de 2013

De Gladio à Gladio-B, et à al Qaïda


De Gladio à Gladio-B, et à al Qaïda

Depuis plus une dizaine d’années, une polémique et diverses révélations font épisodiquement surface à propos du sort de Sibel Edmonds, jeune universitaire multilingue qui fut engagée comme traductrice au FBI immédiatement après l’attaque 9/11 pour des travaux de traduction dont il s’avéra qu’ils portaient sur des documents ultra-sensibles. Elle fut mise à pied après être intervenue auprès de ses supérieurs concernant le contenu de certains des cables ultrasecrets qu’elle avait traduits, qui montraient une collaboration active entre divers services et officiels du gouvernement US, et divers individus et organisations terroristes plus ou moins affiliés à al Qaïda, ou ce qui est regroupé sous ce nom.

Edmonds a publié un livre sur son histoire l’année dernière (Classified Woman: The Sibel Edmonds Story). Elle a rencontré l’universitaire, journaliste, auteur et activiste Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed, qui a publié à la suite de cette interview un long article sur la connexion entre les USA et les groupements islamistes. L’article a été publié le 17 mai 2013 sur le site du magazine CeaseFire, repris sur divers sites et enfin publié sur le propre site de Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed, Cutting Edge, le 21 mai 2013. Dans cette dernière version, Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed rajoute certaines précisions, notamment en nommant certaines personnes jusqu’alors désignées anonymement. Cet article très long, très détaillé, rend compte de l’extraordinaire complexité des connexions USA-islamistes, et des myriades d’implications et d'opérations clandestines qui vont avec.

Nous publions la présentation de son article par Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed, le début de l’article décrivant la carrière d’Edmonds depuis sa mise à pied du FBI et les pressions et diverses attaques juridiques auxquelles elle a du faire face ; et un passage particulièrement intéressant, caractérisant la mise en place et le déploiement d’une organisation désignée Gladio-B, développé à partir du Gladio initial. Le schéma d’utilisation concernant Gladio-B expose que les groupes terroristes islamistes furent utilisés, à partir des années 1990, de la même façon que les groupes néo-fascistes et néo-nazis avaient été utilisés notamment en Europe, dans les années 1970, dans les opérations de montage terroriste dans le cadre des opérations Gladio, particulièrement en Italie et en Belgique.

La connexion est évidemment extrêmement intéressante et permet d’envisager une vue d’ensemble des opérations clandestines et de montage terroriste des activités des services de sécurité nationale des USA, de nombre de pays de l’OTAN, et d’autres pays associés au bloc BAO comme l’Égypte du président Moubarak. Elle confirme l’importance fondamentale de l’opération Gladio, prolongée en Gladio-B, pour l’entièreté de la période depuis 1945. On voit que cette opération générale a tendu et tend toujours à chapeauter, sinon à regrouper finalement l’ensemble des opérations subversives du Système dans sa branche américaniste durant cette période et jusqu’à nos jours, selon le scénario de susciter des changements de politique ou des changements de gouvernement/de régime dans les pays de diverses régions (l’Europe d’abord pour Gladio, l’Asie centrale et ses alentours pour Gladio-B) par une stratégie de provocation utilisant l’instrument du terrorisme, pour des buts spécifiques qui peuvent varier. Ces précisions confirment également l’analyse de Daniele Ganser, universitaire suisse et meilleur spécialiste du Gladio, qui établissaient des connexions directes entre l’action durant la guerre froide de Gladio et les implications du même Gladio autour de l’attaque 9/11 et en général dans cette périodepost-guerre froide (voir deux de nos textes sur Ganser et Gladio, une reprise d’une interview le 27 décembre 2005, une analyse également du même 27 décembre 2005).
Introduction de l’article de Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed

«Last Friday, Ceasefire magazine published my exclusive, in-depth investigative report exposing the Pentagon's covert sponsorship of al Qaeda terrorists from the late 1990s through to 9/11 - including sponsoring Ayman al Zawahiri himself.

»My report is based on interviews with FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds, whose extraordinary case has been covered by the likes of Vanity Fair and American Conservative, as well as with Sunday Times journalists who corroborated her claims and spoke of an investigative series they were working on in 2008, based on her revelations, which was “pulled” inexplicably after US government pressure.

»The report has gone well and truly viral, collecting over 4,000 Facebook shares, 500 Tweets, and being reposted all over the web. The report was also republished by the highly respected US investigative news magazine, Counterpunch.

»But there's more...

»The versions published so far have been edited to avoid naming certain names. Below, exclusively for this blog, I publish the original version identifying the “State Department official” fingered by Sibel in the past - Marc Grossman, a senior government official who has worked for both the Bush and Obama administrations before moving into the private sector/lobbying sector...»
Le Système versus Sibel Edmonds

«A whistleblower has revealed extraordinary information on the U.S. government's support for international terrorist networks and organised crime. The government has denied the allegations yet gone to extraordinary lengths to silence her. Her critics have derided her as a fabulist and fabricator. But now comes word that some of her most serious allegations were confirmed by a major European newspaper only to be squashed at the request of the U.S. government.

»In a recent book, Sibel Edmonds, a former translator for the FBI, describe how the Pentagon, CIA and State Department maintained intimate ties to al-Qaeda militants as late as 2001.Her memoir, Classified Woman: The Sibel Edmonds Story, published last year, charged senior government officials with negligence, corruption and collaboration with al Qaeda in illegal arms smuggling and drugs trafficking in Central Asia.

»In interviews with this author in early March, Edmonds claimed that Ayman al-Zawahiri, current head of al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden's deputy at the time, had innumerable, regular meetings at the U.S. embassy in Baku, Azerbaijan, with U.S. military and intelligence officials between 1997 and 2001, as part of an operation known as 'Gladio B'. Al-Zawahiri, she charged, as well as various members of the bin Laden family and other mujahideen, were transported on NATO planes to various parts of Central Asia and the Balkans to participate in Pentagon-backed destabilisation operations.

»According to two Sunday Times journalists speaking on condition of anonymity, this and related revelations had been confirmed by senior Pentagon and MI6 officials as part of a four-part investigative series that was supposed to run in 2008. The Times journalists described how the story was inexplicably dropped under the pressure of undisclosed “interest groups”, which, they suggest, were associated with the U.S. State Department.

»Described by the American Civil Liberties Union as the “most gagged person in the United States of America” Edmonds studied criminal justice, psychology and public policy at George Washington and George Mason universities. Two weeks after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, her fluency in Turkish, Farsi and Azerbaijani earned her an FBI contract at the Washington DC field office. She was tasked with translating highly classified intelligence from operations against terrorism suspects in and outside the U.S.. In the course of her work, she became privy to evidence that U.S. military and intelligence agencies were collaborating with Islamist militants affiliated with al-Qaeda, the very forces blamed for the 9/11 attacks – and that officials in the FBI were covering up the evidence. When Edmonds complained to her superiors, her family was threatened by one of the subjects of her complaint, and she was fired. Her accusations of espionage against her FBI colleagues were eventually investigated by the Justice Department's Office of the Inspector General, which did not give details about the allegations as they remained classified.

»Although no final conclusions about the espionage allegations were reached, the Justice Department concluded that many of Edmonds' accusations “were supported, that the FBI did not take them seriously enough and that her allegations were, in fact, the most significant factor in the FBI's decision to terminate her services.”

»When she attempted to go public with her story in 2002, and again in 2004, the U.S. government silenced Edmonds by invoking a legal precedent known as “state secrets privilege” – a near limitless power to quash a lawsuit based solely on the government's claim that evidence or testimony could divulge information that might undermine “national security.” Under this doctrine, the government sought to retroactively classify basic information concerning Edmonds's case already in the public record, including, according to the New York Times, “what languages Ms. Edmonds translated, what types of cases she handled, and what employees she worked with, officials said. Even routine and widely disseminated information – like where she worked – is now classified.”

»Although certainly not the first invocation of “state secrets privilege”, since the Edmonds case the precedent has been used repeatedly in the post-9/11 era under both the Bush and Obama administrations to shield the U.S. government from court scrutiny of rendition, torture, warrantless wiretapping, as well as the President's claimed war powers.

»Other intelligence experts agree that Edmonds had stumbled upon a criminal conspiracy at the heart of the American judicial system. In her memoirs, she recounts that FBI Special Agent Gilbert Graham, who also worked in the Washington field office on counterintelligence operations, told her over a coffee how he “ran background checks on federal judges” in the “early nineties for the bureau... If we came up with shit – skeletons in their closets – the Justice Department kept it in their pantry to be used against them in the future or to get them to do what they want in certain cases - cases like yours." A redacted version of Graham's classified protected disclosure to the Justice Department regarding these allegations, released in 2007, refers to the FBI's “abuse of authority” by conducting illegal wiretapping to obtain information on U.S. public officials.»
Description de Gladio-B

«In her March interview with this author, Edmonds said that the Pentagon operations with Islamists were an “extension” of an original 'Gladio' programme uncovered in the 1970s in Italy, part of an EU-wide NATO covert operation that began as early as the 1940s.

»As Swiss historian Dr. Daniele Ganser records in his seminal book, NATO's Secret Armies, an official Italian parliamentary inquiry confirmed that British MI6 and the CIA had established a network of secret “stay-behind” paramilitary armies, staffed by fascist and Nazi collaborators. The covert armies carried out terrorist attacks throughout Western Europe, officially blamed on Communists in what Italian military intelligence called the 'strategy of tension'.

»“You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game” explained Gladio operative Vincenzo Vinciguerra during his trial in 1984. “The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people... to turn to the State to ask for greater security.”

»While the reality of Gladio's existence in Europe is a matter of historical record, Edmonds contends the same strategy was adopted by the Pentagon in the 1990s in a new theatre of operations, namely, Asia. “Instead of using neo-Nazis, they used mujahideen working under various bin Ladens, as well as al-Zawahiri”, she said.

»The last publicly known Gladio meeting occurred in NATO's Allied Clandestine Committee (ACC) in Brussels in 1990. While Italy was a focal point for the older European operations, Edmonds said that Turkey and Azerbaijan served as the main conduits for a completely new, different set of operations in Asia using veterans of the anti-Soviet campaign in Afghanistan, the so-called “Afghan Arabs” that had been trained by al-Qaeda.

»These new Pentagon-led operations were codenamed 'Gladio B' by FBI counterintelligence: “In 1997, NATO asked [Egyptian President] Hosni Mubarak to release from prison Islamist militants affiliated to Ayman al-Zawahiri [whose role in the assassination of Anwar Sadat led to Mubarak’s ascension]. They were flown under U.S. orders to Turkey for [training and use in] operations by the Pentagon”, she said. Edmonds' allegations find some independent corroboration in the public record. The Wall Street Journal refers to a nebulous agreement between Mubarak and “the operational wing of Egyptian Islamic Jihad, which was then headed by Ayman al-Zawahiri... Many of that group's fighters embraced a cease-fire with the government of former President Hosni Mubarak in 1997.”

»Youssef Bodansky, former Director of the Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare, cited U.S. intelligence sources in an article for Defense and Foreign Affairs: Strategic Policy, confirming “discussions between the Egyptian terrorist leader Dr. Ayman al-Zawahiri and an Arab-American known to have been both an emissary of the CIA and the U.S. Government.” He referred to an “offer” made to al-Zawahiri in November 1997 on behalf of U.S. intelligence, granting his Islamists a free hand in Egypt as long as they lent support to U.S. forces in the Balkans. In 1998, Al Zawahiri's brother, Muhammed, led an elite unit of the Kosovo Liberation Army against Serbs during the Kosovo conflict - he reportedly had direct contact with NATO leadership.

»“This is why”, Edmonds continued in her interview, “even though the FBI routinely monitored the communications of the diplomatic arms of all countries, only four countries were exempt from this protocol - the UK, Turkey, Azerbaijan, and Belgium - the seat of NATO. No other country - not even allies like Israel or Saudi Arabia, were exempt. This is because these four countries were integral to the Pentagon's so-called Gladio B operations.”

»Edmonds did not speculate on the objectives of the Pentagon's 'Gladio B' operations, but she highlights the following as possibilities: projecting U.S. power in the former Soviet sphere of influence to access previously untapped strategic energy and mineral reserves for U.S. and European companies; pushing back Russian and Chinese power; and expanding the scope of lucrative criminal activities, particularly illegal arms and drugs trafficking. Terrorism finance expert Loretta Napoleoni estimates the total value of this criminal economy to be about $1.5 trillion annually, the bulk of which “flows into Western economies, where it gets recycled in the U.S. and in Europe” as a “vital element of the cash flow of these economies.”

»It is no coincidence then that the opium trade, Edmonds told this author, has grown rapidly under the tutelage of NATO in Afghanistan: “I know for a fact that NATO planes routinely shipped heroin to Belgium, where they then made their way into Europe and to the UK. They also shipped heroin to distribution centres in Chicago and New Jersey. FBI counterintelligence and DEA (Drug Enforcement Agency) operations had acquired evidence of this drug trafficking in its surveillance of a wide range of targets, including officials in the Pentagon, CIA and State Department. As part of this surveillance, the role of the Dickersons – with the support of Grossman – in facilitating drug-trafficking, came up. It was clear from this evidence that the whole funnel of drugs, money and terror in Central Asia was directed, before 9/11, by Grossman.”

»The evidence for this funnel, according to Edmonds, remains classified in the form of FBI counterintelligence surveillance records she was asked to translate. Although this alleged evidence has never made it to court due to the U.S. government's exertion of 'state secret privilege', she was able to testify in detail concerning her allegations against Grossman and others under oath in 2009. She also aired these allegations in an interview with former CIA official Philip Giraldi in American Conservative magazine the same year...»

dedefensa.org

miércoles, 10 de julio de 2013

Obama, Israel and the Muslim Brotherhood

Foto: Almost One Year Later, Obama-backed Wahhabi Muslim Brotherhood Branch in Egypt Throw People Off Rooftops

http://www.syrianews.cc/year-later-egypt-branch-throw-people-rooftops/

Obama, Israel and the Muslim Brotherhood
http://www.globalresearch.ca/obama-israel-and-the-muslim-brotherhood/31998

Almost One Year Later, Obama-backed Wahhabi Muslim Brotherhood Branch in Egypt Throw People Off Rooftops

http://www.syrianews.cc/year-later-egypt-branch-throw-people-rooftops/  https://www.facebook.com/Iran.Military

Obama, Israel and the Muslim Brotherhood

The global Elite’s puppets are beginning to show their true alliances and rat out each other in an obvious move to find some sort of false sense of security.

Congresswoman Michele Bachmann recently accused Huma Abedin, aide to Hillary Clinton US Secretary of State, as being an infiltrated spy for the Muslim Brotherhood (MB). Bachmann says that the US government has been compromised by the MB and Abedin is working for “America’s demise”.

Bachmann pointed out that Abedin has “routine access to [Clinton] and policymaking.”

While her peers have been denouncing her claims, Bachmann asserts that her investigations into federal agencies has turned up conclusions that there is an obvious influence over intelligence operations with regard to foreign policy by the MB within the US government.

Abedin, who is of Pakistani decent, is married to House Representative Anthony Weiner who is Jewish. Weiner is a self-proclaimed Zionist , as he proudly stated: “Support for Israel was always a very big focus in my household growing up. I am a Zionist.”

Weiner has aligned himself with Morton Klien, president of the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) and has continuously pushed pro-Israeli agendas on Capitol Hill while demanding that the US military assist Israel in fighting against any other Middle Eastern nation that is named as an enemy.

Both The US State Department and Senator John McCain are outraged by Bachmann’s comments; McCain calling the Congresswoman “specious and degrading” while the USSD stated the remarks were “vicious and disgusting lies.”

McCain is a member of the board of directors of the Soros funded International Republican Institute (IRI) which uses coercion of foreign governments to promote “US interests”. They strategically intercede with political agendas to ensure that other nations preform as the globalists would want them to and aid civil society in those nations to guarantee “good governance”.

McCain defended Adebin on a personal level, stating she is “hardworking and loyal servant of our country and our government. These attacks on Huma have no logic, no basis and no merit. They need to stop now.”

Bachmann, believing that there is an influential Islamic element in the US government, has written requests for information in the MB. This “deep penetration” into the US government was addressed in Bachmann’s speech at the Washington summit of Christians United for Israel , a pro-Zionist group masquerading as an evangelical support for Israel. Bachmann spoke to the audience about the ties between Obama and the Muslim Brotherhood.

In April of this year, after Obama announced that the “war on terror is over” he inserted that his administration is working in tandem with the MB , who has been integral in the recent Middle Eastern uprisings. Placing Morsi into power in Egypt was a strategic move that the US has been known for; helping dictators like Saddam Hussein, Fidel Castro, and others get into positions where their actions can support the US/Israeli agenda to control the Middle Easter region.

In celebration of the elections, Obama gave the MB $1.5 billion in foreign aid to the MB. Having a terrorist group in control of this prominent Arab nation is a big coup for the Obama administration. This bribe is obviously a clear indicator that the MB will do the bidding of the US covertly, while appearing to be against the US government on the surface.

The Center for Security Policy (CSP) comes into play as a Washington, DC globalist think-tank that promotes “peace through strength”. CSP believes that “military might and a belief in America’s national power must be preserved and properly used . . . [as] a unique global role in maintaining peace and stability.”

In translation: America is the ultimate military might, policing the world for the sake of supporting peace. How this oxymoron became a credo is suspect.

The CSP strategically works with the USSD, although they claim to be a non-profit and non-specifically affiliated with a political agenda. They force governments to:


Choose between supporting terrorism or their critical partnerships
Coerce corporations to invest in (approved by the USSD) designated non-terrorist groups
Advocate more military defense and nuclear weapons development for the sake of US by participating in UN arms control treaties
Develop the War of Ideas Project that interjects propaganda that supports international relations and control into policymakers and defines who is an adversary
Develop the Islamist Project aimed at singling out their predefined radical Islamic groups as terrorists, then creating fear-mongering around their new Boogeyman
Develop Security and Democracy in Asia Project that promotes the unsubstantiated claims by the CSP that geopolitical control must be obtained in the Asian nations at all costs.
Clinton, who stated publicly that she perceives Israel to be the 51st American state is focusing her talks with the Israeli government on the MB Morsi presidency in Egypt and the Palestinian “problem” that Israel faces.

Previously both Ari Fleischer, President George W. Bush’s former spokesman, and Matthew Brooks, the executive director of the Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC), were involved in recent pro-Israeli events to gain American support for the Zionist movement. Fleischer asserts about presidential candidate Romney: “I don’t want to have a president where we have to wonder does he or does he not have Israel’s back. The choice is between pushing Israel around as President Obama has done, and Governor Romney, who will stand strong by Israel’s side.”

Obama has made his stance on Israel known well with his push for HR 4133 where he gives the Israeli government:


Full backing of US military for endeavors of Israel against her enemies
Unlimited funds from the Federal Reserve Bank
Special training and intelligence to assist Israel government in defeating their adversaries
Within the Israeli government, there have been drastic changes to the internal laws of the nation to provide for a concerted Zionist approach. This fact was causational in the decision of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition partner, Kadima, to leave the allied partnership.

The marriage of Israeli agendas in the Middle East to the military might of the US government is playing out as plans are being enacted against Syria and ultimately Iran in a move toward WW III.

In November, Israel and the US plan to hold a joint military training session in October of this year. Included will be military drills of thousands of soldiers and advanced anti-missile defense systems exercises. It appears to be coincidental that these “war games” will take place just prior to presidential elections in the US.

The two nations, who have become closer over the recent months, are planning to deal with Iran and Syria with as much aggression as they see fit.

A few military analysts have dubbed the drills a “dress rehearsal”, mocking the severity of Obama and Netanyahu’s campaign. Amidst the UN and US sanctions against the two Middle Eastern nations, there is a clear threat of military strike that would serve both the US and Israeli interests.

The preparations for an attack on Iran is being downplayed by the UN while the international community is escalating their claims that Iran’s supposed nuclear endeavors are a violation of treaties; as well as the Iranian government’s failure to properly cooperate with UN inspectors.

Bachmann, who is a supporter of CUFI and the Zionist movement, is preforming a part in the theater of psychological operations. The MB, who are poised to replace al-Qaeda as the next Islamic extremist group and Boogeyman for the American public to fear, are controlled by the Obama administration as part of their adherence to the Israeli/Zionist agenda. This fact validates Bachmann’s assertions that the US government has been infiltrated by a foreign entity. Yet the infiltration was purposefully enacted to the benefit of the global Elite in their march toward global governance by way of elimination of all sovereign nations.

Related content:

jueves, 4 de julio de 2013

Syria: Obama Administration Responsible for “Crimes of Aggression” in Violation of Rome Statute and UN Charter

Thursday, July 4, 2013, 19:32 Beijing







On May 23, Secretary of State John Kerry threatened Syrian President Bashar al-Assad with the following statement concerning U.S. military support of Syrian rebels: “In the event that we can’t find that way forward, in the event that the Assad regime is unwilling to negotiate Geneva I in good faith, we will also talk about our continued support and growing support for the opposition in order to permit them to continue to be able to fight for the freedom of their country.” He repeated that threat again yesterday, July 2, using the same appeal to Geneva I.

So the obvious question—one completely unaddressed by mainstream media—is: “What does Geneva I say that Kerry is so resolute in appealing to it?” This article aims only to address this question briefly, and to suggest a few points of discussion for an examination of what the U.S. is doing in Syria that might be applicable to Geneva I, which so animates Kerry’s assertions of Assad’s international legal responsibilities.




village massacred by Islamic Syria Rebels

As is the case of all U.S. government pronouncements these days, one must examine the consistency, or lack of it, that stands under or behind U.S. decrees. Those seeking consistency from the Obama administration’s policy toward Syria would be disappointed to learn that Geneva I calls for two specific responsibilities of nations involving themselves in military conflicts within other nations.

In each of these two cases, the Obama administration outright ignores these laws while holding Assad accountable to the Convention.

Geneva I is entitled “The Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field.” Among other things, it contains the following two prescriptions for “outsider” nations involving itself in the internal violence of another nation:

Art. 11.

“Any neutral Power, or any organization invited by the Power concerned or offering itself for these purposes, shall be required to act with a sense of responsibility towards the Party to the conflict on which persons protected by the present Convention depend, and shall be required to furnish sufficient assurances that it is in a position to undertake the appropriate functions and to discharge them impartially.”

Art. 50.

“Grave breaches to which the preceding Article relates shall be those involving any of the following acts, if committed against persons or property protected by the Convention: willful killing, torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments, willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health, and extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly.”



US-Backed Syrian Rebels Pound Regime …

Regarding Article 50, we can begin the discussion by noting two things.

First, we know that the rebels being supplied by the U.S. have used chemical weapons supplied by the U.S. Although the U.S. has consistently attempted a propaganda campaign to pin this use on Syrian troops, the fact is the opposite: Last month, Syrian rebels in the Al Nusra Front were arrested on the border of Turkey, literally caught red-handed with chemical weapons materials in their possession—i.e. 4-1/2 pounds of sarin nerve gas.

In addition, Carla del Ponte, United Nations Commissioner on the board of inquiry regarding Syria, stated publicly that the bulk of the evidence indicates that the rebels being armed by the U.S. are the ones using chemical weapons.

Second, one need only examine the barrage of news stories that demonstrate the atrocities of the rebel gangs in Syria being militarily supported by the U.S. Even a cursory examination of the stories demonstrates that these gangs are deliberately attacking civilians and causing other injury and destruction “not justified by military necessity” (Article 50).

The standard U.S. line in response to this is that President Assad’s army is doing the same thing. However, this excuse is both morally and legally (to say nothing of logically) insufficient to justify one’s own actions.

Regarding Article 11, there likewise are at least two things to be noted to start a discussion about what the U.S. is doing in Syria.

First, even given the vague use of the term “responsible” in the Article, one must ask how “responsible” it is to deliberately attempt to overthrow another government that is not threatening to the interfering nation, and which does not have a legitimate internal humanitarian crisis within its borders.

The latter is being created by U.S. support of rebel forces, while the former is the fundamental condition for warring against another nation, both in the Rome Statute (see below) and the U.N. Charter.

Second, it is important to underscore the most glaringly obvious point regarding the U.S. ignoring international conventions, and that is in the crime of aggression, by definition (in the Rome Statute in 1998, Article 5), the use of armed force by one State against another State without the justification of self-defense or authorization by the U.N. Security Council.

It is based on the dual principles of limiting the power of nations to engage in military aggression, with the sole exception of self-defense, and making that proscription apply equally to all nations. Justice Robert H. Jackson, chief prosecutor in the Nuremberg Trials, made those principles quite clear, and they were used in the U.N. Charter concerning war.




For our purposes here, it is important to highlight Article 8, Section I of the Rome Statute, which states that the “crime of aggression” means the planning, preparation, initiation or execution, by a person in a position effectively to exercise control over or to direct the political or military action of a State, of an act of aggression which, by its character, gravity and scale, constitutes a manifest violation of the Charter of the United Nations.”

Most critically, note Section 2(g) of the Statute, where the crime of aggression is spelled out most clearly regarding the supply of rebels, such as the U.S. is doing in Syria: “The sending by or on behalf of a State of armed bands, groups, irregulars or mercenaries, which carry out acts of armed force against another State of such gravity as to amount to the acts listed above, or its substantial involvement therein.”

So once again, we have a United States government making proclamations and threats holding another government to the letter of the law, while it egregiously violates the most important parts of the law to which they are holding another nation; in this case, Syria.

It is not too much for us to demand that the Obama administration act consistently within the rule of law if it intends to capture the moral high ground with regard to its actions in Syria.

But, then again, with all the duplicity and direct violations of international law coming out of the administration, capturing the legal or moral high ground seems not to be Obama’s real concern at all. This is much to the detriment and safety of the entire world, since the sole world superpower is demonstrating itself to be simply a rogue state.

Dr. Robert P. Abele holds a Ph.D. in Philosophy from Marquette University He is the author of three books: A User’s Guide to the USA PATRIOT Act (2005); The Anatomy of a Deception: A Logical and Ethical Analysis of the Decision to Invade Iraq (2009); Democracy Gone: A Chronicle of the Last Chapters of the Great American Democratic Experiment (2009). He contributed eleven chapters to the Encyclopedia of Global Justice, from The Hague: Springer Press (October, 2011).Dr. Abele is a professor of philosophy at Diablo Valley College, located in Pleasant Hill, California in the San Francisco Bay area.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/syria-obama-administration-responsible-for-crimes-of-aggression-in-violation-of-rome-statute-and-un-charter/5341550

Iran commemorates victims of US attack on passenger plane



Iran marks the 25th anniversary of the killing of 290 people in a US missile cruiser’s attack on an Iranian passenger plane in 1988.

The Islamic Culture and Relations Organization of Iran held a meeting in Tehran on Wednesday to commemorate the victims. The meeting was attended by high-ranking Iranian Army and Air Force officials, together with military attachés from countries such as India, Pakistan, and Italy.

During the event, Commander of Khatam al-Anbiya Air Defense Base Brigadier General Farzad Esmaili provided technical details proving that the captain of the US warship made a terrible choice to order firing missiles at the civilian aircraft.

“Based on regulations of the International Civil Aviation Organization, the Americans are responsible for the incident and the casualties,” Esmaili stressed.

“They paid (compensation) for the victims and the airplane, but they never accepted responsibility for the incident. As the presence of the US warship in the Persian Gulf was illegal, all the consequences of its presence were also illegal,” he argued.

Carrying 274 passengers and 16 crew members, the Airbus A-300 had just taken off from the southern Iranian coastal city of Bandar Abbas and was climbing inside an internationally recognized route to Dubai when it was targeted by two Standard missiles fired from USS Vincennes.

Following the incident, US officials claimed their warship mistook the jetliner for an attacking Iranian F-14 fighter plane. The allegation was made as highly sophisticated radar systems and electronic battle gear had been mounted on the warship.

Washington later paid some 95 million dollars in compensation for the Iranian victims and the aircraft.

The money, however, failed to placate the anti-US sentiments in Iran, where people expected the USS Vincennes’ captain, William Rogers, to be held responsible for his criminal act.

Instead, Rogers was awarded the prestigious medal of Legion of Merit for his so-called outstanding service.

The head of Iran's Islamic Culture and Relations Organization Mohammad-Baqer Khorramshad condemned the decoration of the US captain, saying Washington should have formally apologized to the Iranian nation, to say the least.

On Wednesday, a group of Iranians also gathered at the site of the incident in the Persian Gulf and threw flowers into water in memory of their relatives killed onboard the airplane.

MRS/AS/ http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/07/04/312140/iran-marks-us-attack-on-passenger-plane/

Datos personales

Escritora ultimahorajihad@gamail.com