martes, 31 de diciembre de 2013

US Sponsored “Islamic Fundamentalism”: The Roots of the US-Wahhabi Alliance


The alliance between the United States and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia helped spread the ideology of fundamentalist Sunni Islam all over the globe. The majority of its victims are not citizens of Western countries, but citizens of countries that U.S. elites consider a threat to their economic and geopolitical interests. Many victims of Sunni extremism (often called Wahhabism or Salafism[1]) are in fact Muslims (often with a secular leftist or nationalist political background), moderate Sunni or members of Shiʿite Islamic faith.

This article addresses the history of Wahhabi fundamentalism and the examples of Afghanistan in the 80s, as well as the current situation in Syria. Both cases illustrate America’s responsibility for the destruction of secular, socially progressive societies in the Islamic world and elsewhere.

The Origins of Wahhabism

Wahhabi ideology serves U.S. interests for several reasons. Its followers’ archaic perception of society makes them reject any kind of progressive social change. Therefore they are well equipped to push back socialist, secular or nationalist movements, whose independence-oriented policies are a threat to America’s geopolitical agenda. Although Wahhabism certainly is not representative of the majority of Sunni Muslims, Wahhabi Muslims are Sunni extremists, which causes them to maintain an extremely hostile stance towards Shi’te Islam.

After the 2003 invasion of Iraq, which brought down the secular-nationalist regime of Saddam Hussein (a Sunni), the influence of Shi’ite-dominated Iran increased and caused a certain power shift in favor of Shiʿite Islam in the region. Due to this strengthened Shiʿite representation, American activities in the Middle East in recent years have been almost exclusively directed against Shiʿite interests. The emancipation of deprived Shiʿite masses in Iraq, Bahrain, Yemen or Lebanon are contrary to aspirations from the side of the U.S., whose main allies in the region (next to Israel) consist of repressive Sunni regimes and terror groups.

In the case of Syria, President Bashar Al-Assad (an ally of Iran) and the secular Syrian society particularly evoke the hatred of extremists. The fact that Al-Assad belongs to the Alawite minority (a mystical religious group and a branch of Shiʿite Islam) makes him unacceptable to Wahhabi purists.

Portraying Syria ruled solely by its Alawi minority (as some mainstream journalists tend to do) would nevertheless be wrong. As Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya pointed out, among the Syrian top officials killed by a terrorist attack on July 18, 2012, Sunnis and Christians could be found among the Alawites.[2]

It is therefore worth examining the background of these enemies of secularism, multi-faith society and progress. Wahhabism is a puritanical branch of Sunni Islam that was founded in the middle of the 18th Century by Muhammad ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab, a theologian who propagated holy war and the “purification” of Islam. One of his inspirations was Ahmad ibn Hanbal (780-855), who opposed any kind of intellectual debate that differentiated between the word of god and its interpretation.

Al-Wahhab and his ideas might have been forgotten by history if he hadn’t made a pact with Muhammad ibn Saud, emir of Al-Diriyah and ruler of the first Saudi state in 1744.

According to Robert Dreyfuss, the Saudi-Wahhabi alliance:

“…began a campaign of killing and plunder all across Arabia, first in central Arabia, then in Asir in Southern Arabia and parts of Yemen, and finally in Rhiadh and the Hijaz. In 1802 they raided the Shiite holy city of Karbala in what is now Iraq, killing most of the city’s population, destroying the dome over the grave of a founder of Shiism, and looting property, weapons, clothing, carpets, gold, silver and precious copies of the Quran.”[3]

In order to keep the faith “pure”, influences from Greek philosophy, Christianity and Judaism had to be exterminated. Intellectuals, artists, scientists and progressive rulers were declared enemies with no right to live.

It goes without saying that the idea of representing the pure teaching of Islam was fanatically pursued; in fact, Wahhabi warriors were fighting in order to spread the most archaic lifestyle that could be found within Arab culture.

In the second half of the 19th century, British imperialism discovered the house of Al Saud as a potentially useful ally in its attempt to gain influence in the Middle-East.

Riadh had been invaded by the Ottoman sultan in 1818. The Al Saud returned to power in 1823, but its area of control was mainly restricted to the Saudi heartland of the Nejd region, known as the second Saudi State. In 1899 the British helped the Al Saud establish a base in its protectorate of Kuwait, in order to reconquer Riadh, at that time ruled by the pro-Ottoman Al Rashid dynasty.

Originally Great Britain’s motivation to gain influence in the Middle-East was caused by their view of Arabia and the Gulf as being “one link in a chain that ran from Suez to India, the two anchors of the empire.”[4] Vast oil reserves would be discovered in the 1930s.

Great Britain became the first country to recognize the new Saudi Arabia as an independent state, establishing its current borders in 1932. A “Treaty of Friendship and Good Understanding” between the British Crown and the Saudi monarch was signed already in 1927. The 1924 integration of the holy sites of Mecca and Medina into the kingdom through military conquest inevitably contributed to firmly entrenching Al Saud’s authority in the Muslim world.

U.S. interest in Saudi Arabia started to grow as well around the same time, and a treaty with the California Arabian Standard Oil Company was agreed upon in 1932. It was the first such agreement created in cooperation with a western oil company.

In the following years and decades, the increasing revenues in oil business enabled the Saudi financing of religious institutions worldwide, propagating extremist interpretations of Islam. The flow of petro-dollars was of great importance to Saudi elites, who adapted a luxurious lifestyle and at the same time maintained an alliance with the Wahhabi base.[5] They also maintained ties to U.S. state officials, who welcomed Saudi oil as well as radical Islam, as long as it was directed against those standing in the way of America’s geopolitical agenda.

“Foreign aid” financed by the Kingdom was tremendous, according to U.S. “anti-terror” expert Alex Alexiev (though he doesn’t acknowledge the U.S. involvement in spreading Wahhabi terror):

“Between 1975 and 1987, the Saudis admit to having spent $48 billion or $4 billion per year on ‘overseas development aid’, a figure which by the end of 2002 grew to over $70 billion (281 billion Saudi rials).These sums are reported to be Saudi state aid and almost certainly do not include private donations which are also distributed by state-controlled charities. Such staggering amounts contrast starkly with the $5 million in terrorist accounts the Saudis claim to have frozen since 9/11.”[6]

A report from September 2009, made by the United States Government Accountability Office, points out the historical relevance of U.S.-Saudi relations:

“Relations between the United States and Saudi Arabia have a long historical context. Since the establishment of the modern Saudi state in 1932, and throughout the Cold War, the governments of the United States and Saudi Arabia developed a relationship based on shared interests, including energy production and combating communism. For instance, both Saudi Arabia and the United States became major supporters of the Afghan Mujahideen’s struggle against the Soviet invasion in 1979.”[7]

Saudi-backed archaic ideology served as an incentive to thousands of confused young men to receive military training in Pakistan in the 1980s, from where they were sent to Afghanistan in order to kill Russians.

America’s ‘Holy War’ against the USSR in Afghanistan

In a famous interview from 1998, former National Security Advisor to President Carter and geopolitical strategist, Zbigniew Brzezinski, openly admitted that the hidden agenda of U.S. involvement in the war between Soviet troops and Afghan Mujahideen (1979-1988) was about “giving to the USSR its Vietnam war.” He also admitted that American covert support of Islamist fighters in Afghanistan had already started six months prior to the beginning of Soviet intervention in order to create a trap that would eventually lead to the collapse of the USSR. Nothing about this is worth regretting, according to Mr. Brzezinski, not even the U.S. alliance with radical Islam:

“What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the Cold War?”[8]

In addition, the former Pakistani regime under General Zia Ul Haq, whose political program consisted of a plan of “Islamisation” of the country, was the main American ally when it came to training Islamist fighters. This happened under close cooperation between the CIA and the Pakistani intelligence agency ISI (Inter-Services Intelligence). The ideological indoctrination of the people supposed to fight against the Soviets was being delivered by Pakistani madrassas, schools of radical (Wahhabi) Islam, financed by Saudi Arabia.[9]

While U.S. officials justified their support for the Mujahideen by presenting them as some kind of supposed freedom fighters, their Islamist allies showed less restraint in revealing their plans for Afghanistan. One example was the ISI Director General at the time, Akhtar Abdur Rahman Shaheed, who expressed his opinion quite undiplomatically: “Kabul must burn! Kabul must burn!”[10]

While Brzezinski achieved his goal, the fate of Afghanistan is well known: decades of civil war, brutality, analphabetism, the worst possible violation of women’s rights, extreme poverty and sectarian violence. Not to mention pollution by depleted uranium causing a sharp increase in cancer rates thanks to the U.S. bombing campaign from October 2001.

United States and Saudi Arabia against Secular Syria

Many other scenarios involving CIA/Saudi-sponsored terrorism took place in the years following the collapse of the Soviet Union (e.g. in Chechnya, Bosnia, Libya etc.).

Currently, Syria’s secular, multi-ethnic and multi-faith society is being targeted by these very same forces, as well as reactionary regimes belonging to the Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf (GCC) and Turkey. As with the war in Afghanistan in the 80s, U.S. involvement in the Syrian crisis is intended to isolate Iran and, once again, target Russia. In conjunction, Wahhabi extremists are carrying out the same work as their forefathers in the 18th Century, namely fighting all tolerant forms of Islam.

Might this have been the reason why insurgents killed the youngest son of Syria’s highest Islamic authority, Grand Mufti Ahmad Badreddine Hassoun? Indeed, the position of the Grand Mufti is not aligned with Wahhabi extremism, as was clearly shown in last year’s interview with Der Spiegel:

“I see myself as the grand mufti of all 23 million Syrians, not just Muslims, but also Christians and even atheists. I am a man of dialogue. Who knows, maybe an agnostic will convince me with better arguments one day, and I’ll become a non-believer. And if I’m enthusiastic about the opposition’s political platform, I also might change sides.”[11]

In addition, several events that took place on the day this particular interview are worth noticing:

“During the late afternoon, the grand mufti has other appointments: condolence visits with a Christian and a Muslim family. In the evening, he will have to comfort his wife once again, who is completely distraught over the death of Saria. He was the youngest of the couple’s five sons, and the only one still living at home. Saria’s fellow students are holding a vigil at his stone sarcophagus, even now, four weeks after the murder. The young man’s last resting place can be found in the courtyard of a modest mosque. Sheikh Hassoun visits this sad place every day.”[12]

This certainly does not correspond with the Western media’s picture of fanatical Islamists, who consider the death of their sons a sign of honour and martyrdom, as long as they have died under circumstances that caused the death of “infidels” as well. Such behaviour is encouraged by Saudi Arabia, as can be seen on a shocking video available on YouTube. The shocking footage features a father in Jeddah, selling his son to be sent to Syria as a suicide bomber. Even if one questions the authenticity of the video, the ongoing suicide bombings in Syria are undoubtedly real:


To be sure, the religion of Islam poses just as much or little a threat to the world as the religions of Judaism or Christianity. Nevertheless, certain radical pockets exist who use and abuse religion to justify their disgust for dissent and whose totalitarian practices can only be classified as fascist. Their attempts to destroy reason, progress and humanist ideals make them ideal tools for the most aggressive imperialist factions within the U.S. establishment to push for regime change and implement their exploitative impoverishing agendas.


1“Wahhabi” is a term usually used in a critical context by Muslims. Salafi means “ancestor” and is most often a term used by Sunni fundamentalists to describe themselves.


3 Dreyfuss, Robert: “Devil’s Game: How the United States helped unleash fundamentalist Islam”, New York 20

05, S. 37.

4 Ibid.

martes, 24 de diciembre de 2013

Santa Claus fights foreign-backed terrorists in Syria. Israeli parliament bans Christmas tree display

Santa Claus fights terrorists in Syria
Santa Claus fights terrorists in Syria

In recent days photos of fighters clad in Santa costumes posted on social media underscore Syrian Christians’ determination to fight back Takfiri and al-Qaeda-linked terrorists in the Arab country.

Syrian Christian citizens, along with other ethnic Syrians, have mobilized forces and taken up arms to fight back foreign-backed terrorists who stormed the Arab country three years ago.

With the arrival of the cold season and snowfall which are harbinger of Christmas, Syrian Christians remained resolute not to leave their homes but fight back terrorists and celebrate Christmas.

The foreign-sponsored armed groups, including al-Qaeda-linked al-Nusra Front terrorists, recently have stormed several predominantly Christian towns and villages and massacred the Christian residents.

Earlier this month, Bishop Luca al-Khoury, a senior Orthodox Church official, has urged Christians to take up arms in Syria and defend themselves against extremists, condemning the international community for not stopping flow of arms to Syria militants.

Syrian army supported by citizens has taken advantage of the severe weather conditions of winter to push terrorists back.

RA/NJF See more at:

Israeli parliament bans Christmas tree display

A Palestinian boy and his grandmother decorate a Christmas tree on their balcony overlooking Israel

A Palestinian boy and his grandmother decorate a Christmas tree on their balcony overlooking 

Israel's controversial separation barrier in the biblical West Bank city of Bethlehem, the place where Christians believe Jesus was born, on December 16, 2010 ahead of Christmas celebrations.
The speaker of Israeli parliament has denied a request by a Christian lawmaker to display a Christmas tree in the parliament building, a spokesman for the speaker says.

Speaker Yuli Edelstein rejected his colleague’s request to publicly display a Christmas tree, but said he could have one in his office or in his party’s conference room, the Associated Press reported.

A spokesman for Edelstein said on Monday that keeping a tree in Parliament until Orthodox Christmas ends on January 7 would be too long.

This isn’t the first ban on Christmas trees in Israel.

The mayor of an Israeli town bordering Nazareth has refused to allow town-sponsored Christmas trees in the past, despite the fact that the town has some Christian residents.

BA/BA- See more at:

martes, 10 de diciembre de 2013

See the Prawer Plan map Israel's government was keeping secret

Former minister Benny Begin, who helped draft the Prawer Plan, denies saying Israel’s Bedouin support the plan: How could they if they never even saw it?

(Click the map to enlarge.)

Map of the planned land confiscation and compensation as part of the Begin-Prawer Plan (Image: Courtesy of MK Dov Khenin).
Light blue: Jewish town
Orange: Bedouin municipality
Purple: To be expropriated by the state
Green outline: Land to be given to unrecognized villages
Red outline: Land for other uses (pasture, etc.)

Until now, nobody knew the extent of the Prawer-Begin Plan. No government official or statement has detailed how many Bedouin citizens will be displaced, how many unrecognized villages razed and how much land will be expropriated by the state.

MK Dov Khenin (Hadash) on Monday published a copy of a map distributed to members of the Knesset Interior Affairs Committee. The map was prepared by the Prime Minister’s Office for Housing Minister Uri Ariel of the Jewish Home party in an attempt to assuage his party’s fears that too much land would be given to the Bedouin.

Read +972′s full coverage of the Prawer-Begin Plan

According to a report published yesterday on +972, the new map details plans to displace some 40,000 Bedouin and for the state to expropriate 250,000 dunams (61,700 acres) of Bedouin land.

“The government hid this map from the Bedouin. The government hid this map from the Knesset,” MK Khenin wrote on his Facebook page.

It was not clear whether the map was merely an explanatory document meant to swing votes in the Knesset or an actual working document for the eventual implementation of Prawer. MK Merav Michaeli wrote on Twitter Monday afternoon, “[I]t seems the doc the gov presented isn’t the original doc, the gov is still hiding the original and why the changes.”

Another central figure in the formulation of the Prawer-Begin Plan, half of its namesake, former minister Benny Begin, sent a surprising letter to the Knesset Interior Affairs Committee on Monday.

Coalition leader Yariv Levin (Likud) has insinuated and declared that Begin told him the Bedouin community supports the Prawer Plan, or at least that it is a compromise they would accept.

Begin on Monday refuted that he ever made such statements, writing, “I have never said to anyone that the Bedouin accept my plan.”

He couldn’t have made such a claim, he explained, because he never even presented the Bedouin community with his plan, “and therefore I could not have heard their reactions to it.”

“[Because] I was not able to know their level of support for the law, it therefore follows that I couldn’t say that I know anything about their support for the law.”

In addition to Levin’s now-contested Begin quote, Israeli government spokespeople have responded to anti-Prawer protests in recent weeks by making an unsubstantiated claim that 80 percent of the Bedouin population supports the Prawer-Begin Plan.

“How can you claim that 80 percent of the Bedouin population accepts the Prawer Plan when the most basic information about he plan is hidden even from members of Knesset who are voting on it, and certainly hiding from the Bedouin in the Negev,” anti-Prawer activist Huda Abu-Obaid said on Monday.

Read more about the state’s treatment of anti-Prawer activists

“Now it won’t be possible to hide behind vague statements about a plan ‘for the benefit of the Bedouin’,” added another activist, Fadi Elobra. “These documents show anyone who wants to see that this is a plan that will bring about the expulsion of at least 40,000 people from their homes and the expropriation of most of the land under Bedouin ownership in the Negev.”

The activists called on Knesset members to listen to them and their objections to Prawer, vowing to continue protesting against it until the dozens of unrecognized villages in the Negev are recognized and connected to state infrastructure.

Prawer Plan: How the natives became invaders in their own homes
The historical truth about Bedouin expulsion from the Negev

For additional original analysis and breaking news, visit +972 Magazine'sFacebook page or follow us on Twitter. Our newsletter features a comprehensive round-up of the week's events. Sign up here.

jueves, 5 de diciembre de 2013

حزب الله سيردّ

إسرائيل ضربت... والمقاومة سترد

ابراهيم الأمين

مَن اتخذ قرار الضربة الأليمة واللئيمة التي وجهت أمس إلى المقاومة الإسلامية، عبر اغتيال أحد قادتها الميدانيين؟ من فكر، ومن خطط، ومن اختار التوقيت؟ وعلى أي خلفية فعل ذلك، ولمصلحة من؟ وأية أهداف قرر تحقيقها عبر هذا العمل الأمني ــ السياسي الخطير؟

المؤشرات الخاصة بكيفية تنفيذ الجريمة، تقود كلها إلى إسرائيل. ليس هناك سوى احتمالات ضئيلة جداً، بأن تكون جهة أخرى غير إسرائيل من قام بالعمل. وحتى لو ثبت ذلك، وهو احتمال مستبعد إلى جانب ضآلته، فإن من اختار الهدف ومن قدم المعطيات ومن وفر الخطة هم مجموعة من الاستخبارات النافذة في كيان العدو. ولذلك، لم يكن حزب الله، بحكم خبرته الطويلة في المواجهة مع العدو، بحاجة إلى وقت وإلى جهد قبل تحميل إسرائيل مسؤولية الجريمة، وإنذارها بضرورة تحمل تبعات مثل هذه الأعمال.

بالمعنى المهني، يمكن القول بأن اغتيال قيادي مقاوم، هو جزء من الحرب المفتوحة بين المقاومة والعدو، وبالتالي لا استغراب في ما قامت به إسرائيل. وقد يخرج من يحمّل المقاومة مسؤولية عدم حماية قياداتها. وهو يكون كمن يريد القول بأنه لا داعي لتكبير الموضوع. ومتى ردت المقاومة تكون قد ردت وانتهى الأمر. بالمعنى المهني نفسه، يمكن اعتبار التحليل السابق صحيحاً، لو أن الأمر يقتصر على عمل أمني، أو أنه يقتصر على عمل موضعي لا خلفيات ولا أبعاد له تتصل بكل ما يجري في لبنان وسوريا والمنطقة والإقليم وحتى العالم.

لنضع جانباً ردّ فعل العدو ونفيه علاقته بالجريمة، وبيانات الإدانة والتنديد. لكن ليجرِ التوقف أمام معلومات وردت مساء أمس، عبر قنوات ديبلوماسية، تشير إلى «قلق غربي من أن تكون العملية خطوة إسرائيلية تستهدف ما هو أبعد من اغتيال أحد أعدائها».

القلق الغربي لا يحتاج إلى شرح طويل. فإسرائيل غاضبة فعلاً من الاتفاق القائم بين الغرب وإيران. وإسرائيل غاضبة أكثر من كون الاتفاق وضعها جانباً، وأهمل ـــ من وجهة نظرها ـــ مصالحها الاستراتيجية التي لطالما كانت مقدسة عند الغرب. وإسرائيل غاضبة، لأن الاتفاق قيّدها إزاء ما تراه حقاً في التصرف ضد المشروع النووي الإيراني. وإسرائيل غاضبة، لأن الغرب قدم للمرة الأولى صورة عن تناقض ممكن بين مصالحه ومصالح إسرائيل، وأن ما حصل هو سابقة قابلة للتكرار في أمور أخرى وفي ملفات أخرى.

لكن لنناقش ما الذي فكرت فيه إسرائيل عندما قررت القيام بهذه المغامرة.
واضح أنها تعرف جيداً أنه لا مجال لأن تخوض مغامرة ضد إيران مباشرة. وإضافة إلى العجز عن تنفيذها حرباً من هذا النوع من دون دعم غربي مباشر، فهي تعرف أن من ذهب للاتفاق مع إيران إنما فعل ذلك بعدما فشلت كل الحلول الأخرى. والفشل العسكري قائم، ولو أنه لم يحصل. وإذا ما قررت إسرائيل توجيه ضربة أمنية إلى إيران، فهي عملت طويلاً على الخبراء النوويين. ولو فعلت الأمر نفسه بالأمس، لما كانت قد حققت أي هدف سياسي أو غير سياسي، بل لكانت قد وضعت نفسها في مأزق حقيقي مع حلفائها قبل الآخرين.

تعرف إسرائيل أيضاً، أن معركتها اليوم تفترض منها توجيه ضربة تقول فيها للغرب إنها غير ملتزمة «تماماً» جدول أعمال الغرب لما بعد الاتفاق النووي مع إيران، وإنها تريد «حماية هوامشها الردعية». وهي في الوقت نفسه، تريد أن تقول لإيران ومحورها، إن الاتفاق مع الغرب لا يعني توقف الحرب على مشروعها النووي، ولا على دورها الإقليمي، ولا على وقوفها إلى جانب قوى المقاومة في لبنان وفلسطين. لكن إسرائيل تعرف أنه لا يمكن توجيه الرسالة مباشرة إلى إيران في هذه اللحظات. ومع أن الهجوم الانتحاري على السفارة الإيرانية في بيروت شكل رسالة مزدوجة التوقيع، من قبل إسرائيل ومن قبل حليفتها السعودية، إلا أن إسرائيل لا تكتفي برسائل ملتوية. وفي ذلك دليل ضعف.

تعرف أسرائيل أيضاً أن هناك قراراً كبيراً، في دمشق وموسكو وطهران وبيروت، بأن الغارات التي تقوم بها ضد أهداف سورية بين الوقت والآخر، ليست ذات شأن، قياساً بالحرب الكونية التي تشن على سوريا. وأن القرار يؤجل أي ردّ على غارات إسرائيل، وأن الطرف المقابل يحتفظ بحق الردّ، لكنه لن يخوض المعركة وفق جدول أعمال إسرائيل وتوقيتها.
بناءً على ذلك، وجدت إسرائيل أنها أمام خيارات ضيقة، وهي خيارات حساسة وصعبة، لكنها تفيد في خدمة أكثر من هدف. وقامت بجريمة اغتيال قيادي بارز في المقاومة الإسلامية. وهي قالت لحزب الله عملياً إن يدها الأمنية لا تزال طويلة، وإنها قادرة على توجيه ضربات «جريئة»، و«من دون وسيط» إذا لزم الأمر. وهي تريد إشعار حزب الله ومن خلاله إيران بأن إسرائيل تترجم رفضها لكل ما اتُّفق عليه بين الغرب وطهران. وعندما قررت إسرائيل هذه الخطوة، عرفت أنها قادرة على البعث برسائل إلى «الحلفاء الجدد»، وخصوصاً السعودية، ومفادها أن «عدونا واحد، ويمكنكم أن تتبنوا عملاً نقوم به نحن ضد حزب الله، وها نحن نشد على أيديكم، ونقول لكم، لا تخضعوا لضغوط الغرب بشأن إيران ولا بشأن سوريا، وانتزعوا معنا الهامش الذي نفرض من خلال وقائع على الأرض تمنع تجاهلنا في أي تسوية يعمل عليها في المنطقة. وها نحن نمسّ بالعدو الصلب الذي تشتكون منه هذه الفترة، ونقول لكم إننا إلى جانبكم في الميدان وليس في البيانات فقط».

لكن كيف قدرت إسرائيل موقف حزب الله وردّ فعله إزاء جريمة بهذا الحجم؟
الأجوبة محدودة على هذا السؤال. فإما أن إسرائيل تسعى فعلياً إلى مغامرة تستدرج من خلالها المنطقة، ومحور المقاومة على وجه الخصوص، إلى مواجهة تتدحرج صوب حرب تعتقد إسرائيل أنها مناسبة لها الآن، لأن سوريا منهكة بأزمتها، وإيران منشغلة باحتفالات الاتفاق مع الغرب، وحزب الله منشغل في مساندة الرئيس بشار الأسد، وبالتالي فإن معركتها ستكون أسهل، وربما هي تأمل أن يكون لديها الغطاء الذي بشرنا به ولَيد آل سعود، وأن يكون لديها من يساعدها على الأرض أيضاً في مواجهة حزب الله وسوريا وربما إيران.

أما الجواب الآخر، فهو أن تكون إسرائيل معنية بتوجيه الرسالة فقط، وهي تعتبر أن القيود التي تمنع الحكم في سوريا من الردّ على غاراتها، موجودة أيضاً عند حزب الله، وأنه لن يكون بمقدوره الردّ موضعياً، ولا أكثر من ذلك.
لكن واقع الحال قد يقود إلى نتائج أخرى.

من راقب أمس طريقة إعلان استشهاد القائد البطل حسان اللقيس، والمسارعة إلى دفنه دون مواقف استثنائية، وخصوصاً على لسان الأمين العام لحزب الله السيد حسن نصر الله، وعدم نشر أي معلومات من جانب الحزب عن الشهيد، بما في ذلك عدم نشر نبذة شخصية أو جهادية عنه، كل ذلك يقود من يعرف عقل المقاومة إلى نتيجة واحدة: ثمة رائحة دماء تفوح من خلف الحدود الجنوبية... ولننتظر!

martes, 3 de diciembre de 2013

Sayyed Nasrallah: Nuclear Deal Wiped Polarization off the World Map

Local Editor

Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah stated Tuesday that he Iranian nuclear deal has had significant implications, expressing beliefs that the first winners are the peoples of our region.

"There were regional and international parties during the past years, pushing towards war on Iran. This option is neither easy nor simple for Iran is not a weak or isolated state. This option had serious implications against the region," Sayyed Nasrallah stated during a live interview on the local OTV channel.

"Fist implication was to delay the war on Iran option," his eminence said, ruling out that the Zionist entity may strike the Iranian nuclear facilities without the American green light.

Sayyed Nasrallah also pointed out that the Iran-P5+1 nuclear deal has devoted a new reality of multi-polarization, where there is no single state ruling the world anymore.

" Multi-polarization leadership in the world prevents international domination and dictatorship and gives margins for the third world countries,\" his eminence elaborated.

The U.S. Foreign Policy

Sayyed Nasrallah stated that there are huge turning points in the U.S. world policy, highlighting that even though the nuclear deal is interim, yet some people rushed to say that it is a deal between the Valiye Faqih (Islamic Republic of Iran) and the great Satan (The United States).

"The US war on Iraq had doomed to failure. In Afghanistan, the U.S. reached a deadlock. In Lebanon and Gaza, the new Middle East also failed. They are failing so far in Syria. Iran has withstanded before sanctions and they (the U.S.) were unable to topple the regime. On the contrary, the Financial and economic situation in the U.S. and European countries is critical. Thus there is new U.S.-European situation," his eminence expressed.

Justifying the American sponsorship for the Iran-P5+1 deal, Sayyed Nasrallah said that the Americans do not want to engage in a war, and they are sick of wars. Therefore, a door for nuclear deal has been opened and an interim deal was set.

"Americans requested to tackle more files while negotiating the nuclear issue, while Iranians wanted to tackle the nuclear file only. Iranians have no interest in putting all files on table and they insisted on negotiating the nuclear case alone," his eminence said.

Hezbollah Secretary General indicated that Iran has stated for long that its political view towards the U.S. differs from that towards the Zionist entity, and that's why the Iranian position on Israel is definite and has not changed.

"Iranian was saying that when the Americans admitted our rights and be ready to give the peoples of the region theirs, we will be ready then for dialogue with them," Sayyed Nasrallah made it clear.

"There is a U.S. shift but the Iranian party still stands in place. It is too early to taclk about normalization between the two countries and there are a lot of pending files. I don't predict near normalization," he added.

Regarding the Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif's last visit to the Gulf states, Sayyed Nasrallah said that Iran hasn't cut relations with neighbor countries ever, but the problem lies with the other party, noting that the Iranian FM wants to reassure the Saudis that nothing has been agreed upon against their interests.

More To Follow ...

Source: Al-Manar Website 03-12-2013

viernes, 29 de noviembre de 2013

Saudi suicide

While Saudi Arabia has adopted the Qatari plan to overthrow the Syrian secular regime, Riyadh seems unable to adapt to the sudden withdrawal of the U.S. Not only did the Saudis reject the Russian-American accord but they pursue the war and announce retaliation to "punish" the United States. For Thierry Meyssan, this stubborness is equivalent to collective suicide by the family of Saud.

JPEG - 24.7 kb

Unleashed by the United States against Syria, will Saudi Arabia commit suicide if defeated? This is what one might conclude from the following events:

On July 31st, 2013, Prince Bandar bin Sultan visited Russia, where he not only met his counterpart, the intelligence chief , but also President Vladimir Putin. There are two versions of this meeting. For the Saudis, Bandar spoke on behalf of the Kingdom and the United States. He offered to buy 15 billion dollars worth of Russian weapons if Moscow dropped Syria. For the Russians, he spoke arrogantly, first threatening to send jihadists to disrupt the Olympic Games in Sochi if Moscow persisted in supporting the secular regime in Damascus, then trying to bribe him. Whatever the truth, Putin felt that his interlocutor was insulting Russia.

On September 30th, Prince Saud Al -Faisal had been included on the agenda of the general debate of the 68th session of the General Assembly of the United Nations, but, enraged by the warming of relations between Iran and the U.S., the Saudi Minister of Foreign Affairs left without excusing himself. In his anger, he refused to have his pre-printed speech distributed to delegates.

On October 11th, the Deputy Secretary General of the United Nations and former head of the Department of State for the Middle East, Jeffrey Feltman, received a Lebanese delegation. Speaking on behalf of Mr. Ban, but probably even more on behalf of President Obama, he had no words strong enough to criticize Saudi foreign policy, built on grudges and unable to adapt to a changing world.

On the 18th of October, the General Assembly of the United Nations, with 176 votes out of 193, elected Saudi Arabia as a non-permanent member of the Security Council for two years from January 1st, 2014. Ambassador Abdallah El- Mouallemi congratulated himself for this victory that reflects "the effectiveness of Saudi policy marked by moderation". (sic) But a few hours later, Prince Saud Al-Faisan issued a press release with Nasserist overtones on the incapacity of the Security Council and the refusal of the Kingdom to take its seat. If the main official reason given was the Syrian issue, the minister offered hiself the luxury of also denouncing the Palestinian issue and the weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East, that is to say, to designate as enemies of peace both Iran and Israel. Knowing that the criticism of the Syrian UN policy is a challenge directly to Russia and China, who made ​​use of their vetoes three times, this press release was an insult to Beijing, although China is currently the main customer for Saudi oil. This about face, which plunged the United Nations into dismay, however, was loudly applauded by the presidents of Turkey and France declaring that they share the "frustrations" of Saudi Arabia on Syria.

On October 21st, the Wall Street Journal revealed that Prince Bandar bin Sultan had invited European diplomats posted in Riyadh to his home. There the head of the secret services narrated Saudi fury against Iranian rapprochement with the U.S. and U.S. military withdrawal from Syria. He is said to have announced to his guests that the kingdom would retaliate by divesting from America. Returning to the episode of the seat on the Security Council, the newspaper clarified that according to Prince Bandar, the statement was not directed against Beijing but against Washington; such a clarification being all the more interesting for not corresponding to the situation.

Faced with the disbelief generated by these statements and soothing comments from the State Department, Prince Turki bin Faisal explained to Reuters that the words of his personal enemy, Bandar, committed the kingdom and that the new policy would not be questioned. There is therefore no longer a question of a division of power between the two rival branches of the ruling family, the Sudairi against the Shuraim, but of their common vision.

In summary, Saudi Arabia insulted Russia in July, China two weeks ago, and now the United States. The Kingdom announced that it will withdraw its investments from America likely in favour of Turkey and France, even though no expert can see how this would be possible. Two explanations for this behavior are possible: either Riyadh feigned anger to allow Washington to continue the war in Syria without taking responsibility, or the family of Saud committed political suicide.

The first hypothesis seems contradicted by the declarations of Prince Bandar before the European ambassadors. If he was playing under the table for the United States, he would have refrained from coming to preach revolution to its allies.

The second hypothesis recalls the behavior of camels, animal fetishes of the Saudi Bedouins. They are reputed to be capable of carrying a grudge for years, not finding peace until they have satisfied their revenge whatever the cost.

However, the survival of Saudi Arabia is at stake since the appointment of John O. Brennan at the head of the CIA in March 2013. Formerly stationed in Saudi Arabia, he is a staunch opponent of the system put in place with Riyadh by his predecessors: international jihadism. Brennan believes that even if these fighters once did a good job in Afghanistan, Yugoslavia and Chechnya, they have become too numerous and unmanageable. What started as a few Arab extremists taking pot shots at the Red Army became a constellation of groups present from Morocco to China, fighting ultimately much more for the triumph of the Saudi model of society than to defeat adversaries of the United States. Already in 2001, the United States had thought to eliminate Al Qaeda by blaming it for the attacks of September 11th. However, with the official Osama Bin Laden assassination in May of 2011, they decided to rehabilitate the system and made great use of it in Libya and Syria. Without Al Qaeda Muammar el- Qaddafi could never have been overthrown. This is evident today by the presence of Abdelhakim Belhaj, former number two of the organization, as military governor of Tripoli. Anyway in the eyes of John O. Brennan, international jihadism should be reduced to low levels and be kept only as a special lever of the CIA for some occasions.

Jihadism is not only the only effective force in Saudi Arabia, whose army is divided into two units obeying the two clans of the Saud family, but also its sole purpose. Washington does not need the kingdom to provide it with oil nor to plead the cause of peace with Israel. Hence the return to the old neocon Pentagon plan: "Throw the Saudis out of Saudi Arabia," the title of a July, 2002 powerpoint presentation to the Political Council of the Department of Defense. This project foresees the dismantling of the country into five distinct areas, three of which are to form independent states from each other and two of which would be attached to other states.

By choosing a showdown with the United States, the family of Saud doesn’t give them a choice. It is unlikely that Washington will allow itself to be dictated to by a few wealthy Bedouins but predictable that it will have them fall in line. In 1975, they did not hesitate to have King Faysal assassinated. This time, they will likely be even more radical.
Thierry Meyssan

Roger Lagassé

sábado, 23 de noviembre de 2013

Chechen Official Fired for Daughter’s Ties With Syrian Rebels. HRW: Militants committed war crimes in Sadad, Homs

Chechen Islamic fighters "Archive"

23 November ,2013 17:07 PM
Section : Politics - Syria Breaking News Network - Agencies

For months, the Kremlin has sounded warnings that Russian-speaking Islamists were joining rebels in Syria. Now it seems to be confronted with defections from the families of some of its own officials.

The top immigration official in the predominantly Muslim southern Russian republic of Chechnya was fired after it was disclosed that his daughter had joined Syrian rebels trying to overthrow Syria’s Bashar al-Assad, officials confirmed Friday.

Kremlin-backed Chechen President Ramzan Kadyrov announced the firing on his Instagram account Thursday night, saying, “It’s no longer possible to trust” Asu Dudarkayev as the head of Chechnya’s regional migration service.

Mr. Dudarkayev was unavailable for comment Friday.

The Kremlin fears that Islamist rebels from Russia are gaining battle experience and jihadist contacts in Syria, and that they will one day return to Russia and stir up trouble. A number of Chechen rebels have already emerged as leaders among Syrian rebels because of their experience in fighting a standing army in Russia.

Mr. Kadyrov, an ethnic Chechen whose loyalty with President Vladimir Putin has helped the Kremlin crush rebels in Chechnya, said he had received reports that migration service employees were rude and were using bureaucratic hurdles to extract bribes from citizens.

But Mr. Kadyrov also noted that Mr. Dudurkayev’s daughter was “among Wahabbis and bandits who are spilling the blood of peaceful citizens and blowing up Islamic shrines in Syria.”

Mr. Kadyrov said the Chechen government had offered to help him retrieve his daughter, but that he had said he would resolve the issue on his own.

“[Mr. Dudarkayev's] daughter is still with the bandits,” Mr. Kadyrov wrote on his Instagram page.

Moscow has for years fought a simmering Islamist insurgency in its rugged North Caucasus region, and has lately stepped up pressure on rebel groups, fearing they may launch an attack on the Winter Olympic Games in the southern coastal city of Sochi next year.

Some of the pressure has been applied to family members of insurgents as well: In the southern province of Dagestan, security forces have taken to blowing up the homes of relatives of suspected rebels, and President Vladimir Putin earlier this month signed a law making families of terrorists financially accountable for damage of their attacks.

Foto: A recent #Chechen commander in Al_Nusra front ( Al_Qaeda ) who is fighting in #Syria against the Syrian people and the Syrian Arab Army.
-A former solider in the undercover Georgian army ( Since he is not Georgian but Chechen ) who fought for the #US government and the #NATO in #Iraq
A recent #Chechen commander in Al_Nusra front ( Al_Qaeda ) who is fighting in #Syria against the Syrian people and the Syrian Arab Army.
-A former solider in the undercover Georgian army ( Since he is not Georgian but Chechen ) who fought for the #US government and the #NATO in #Iraq

HRW: Militants committed war crimes in Sadad, Homs

Section : Politics - Syria  Breaking News Network - Agencies

New York, Human Rights Watch (HRW) confirmed that armed groups in Syria committed violations that amount to war crimes in their attack against Sadad town in Homs in late October, 2013.

The HRW said in extracts of a report published on its website that the gunmen committed violations that included execution of civilians, indiscriminate shelling, sniper attacks, use of residents as human shields and targeting and vandalizing churches.

The report included testimonies of eyewitnesses who confirmed that the gunmen refused to allow the villagers to leave their homes in areas with active fighting, which caused casualties among the civilians.

Others said that the gunmen used civilians as human shields.

The eyewitnesses also confirmed that the gunmen stole the possessions of residents and looted and intentionally vandalized civilian sites and holy places.

jueves, 14 de noviembre de 2013

Plot To Kill Obama And Blow Up D.C. Subway Shocks US Allies

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

A truly grim Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) report circulating in the Kremlin today claims that the “traditional” Western allies of the United States are “in total shock” today over the near assassination of President Barack Obama during what was planned to be a massive terror attack on the subway and rail systems of Washington D.C. that were being “false flagged” by dissident elements of the US military. 
According to this report, this false flag attack was timed to occur during this week’s two-day GridEx II terror exercise that simulates a nationwide collapse of the electric grid due to cyberterror or other attacks upon the United States, but was thwarted when its chief architects were discovered and this plot was unmasked.

These chief architects have been identified by the GRU as Vice-Admiral Ted Branch and Rear Admiral Bruce Loveless who were the US Navy's top intelligence officials, both of whom were removed from duty by Obama this past Friday.

Important to note about this current false flag attempt, this report says, is that Russian intelligence experts have long suspected that renegade elements of the US Navy intelligence services were “deeply complicate” in the 11 September 2001 (9/11) attacks upon the United States that was only able to be stopped after their main headquarters in the Pentagon were destroyed by a cruise missile

Also, this report continues, it is important to note that the US militaries pattern of using a GridEx II type exercise as cover for a planned assassination and/or false flag terror attack was more than evidenced on 9/11 when no less than 5 terror exercises were currently ongoing when the Twin Towers were attacked and brought down.

In this current plot, the GRU says in their report, at least 5 casualties have been reported that include 4 US Marines killed yesterday when they attempted to defuse one of the explosive devices removed from a Washington D.C. subway car, and a “major co-conspirator” named Ronald Kirby who was gunned down in his home by loyal Obama forces on Monday.
Kirby, this report says, was described as a “giant in the room” due to his institutional knowledge of the Washington region’s transportation system — both on the highway and on the rails — that was unmatched and knew the most vital vulnerabilities of the D.C. subway system.

Two former US Naval Seals who were part of Obama’s Secret Service protective detail, Ignacio Zamora Jr. and Timothy Barraclough, have also been linked by the GRU to this plot, and like their US Naval intelligence overseers were likewise dismissed from duty this week

As to why the US military would want to eliminate Obama this GRU report says can be gleaned from the information released by Secret Service agent Dan Bongino who this past week warned the American people about the Obama regime by stating:

“We’re in a lot of trouble.
The President sees government – and I think it’s because of his lack of experience and maybe community organizing in the past – as this shiny new toy.
For all the disagreements I had with Clinton, Carter and Bush there were always limits… there was that line you just didn’t cross… We cross it seemingly every day. We’re lost in the scandals…
The Jamie Dimon shakedown at Chase… the HHS scandal.. Kathleen Sebelius shaking down the health care industry for money… the IRS… it’s to the point where these scandals in and of themselves would be huge back-breaking scandals [but] are just lost in the scandal fog of this administration…
It’s worse than people know… and I’m not trying to scare you either.”

The precedent for killing an American President for abusing his office, this report says, was established in 1963 with the planned assassination of John F. Kennedy who was a secret drug abuser and deathly ill due to Addisons Disease and whom the US military-industrial-complex detested for his failure to stand up to Soviet communism.
Kennedy, indeed all of America, had been warned about this danger when on 17 January 1961 President Dwight D. Eisenhower issued his prophetic warning about the military-industrial complex, anticipating the increased political, economic, military and even cultural influence of the Pentagon and its allies.

Several weeks earlier, he had privately told his senior advisers in the Oval Office, “God help this country when someone sits in this chair who doesn't know the military as well as I do.”
Where Kennedy failed to heed Eisenhower’s warning, this report concludes, the same cannot be said of Obama who has during the past 5 years has purged the US military of nearly 200 of its top officers, created a Department of Homeland Security “spy grid” across the entire United States, established a National Security Agency that can track the location of each citizens phone even when it is turned off and the batteries have been removed, and now rules over a nation that has more prisoners in its gulag than high school teachers and engineers combined

To the only modern-times world leader Obama can be compared to, this GRU report ends, is former Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin who during the 1934-1939 Great Purge, likewise, eliminated his military and political opposition while at the same time creating a police-state that has not been rivaled until the present day United States.

November 14, 2013 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.

[Ed. Note: Western governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagrees with in believing that it is every human beings right to know the truth.  Due to our missions conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ against us has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit and which is addressed in the report “Who Is Sorcha Faal?”.]

sábado, 9 de noviembre de 2013

US In Shock After All Obamacare Signup Info Goes To Russian Hacker

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

A stunning new Federal Security Services (FSB) report circulating in the Kremlin today confirms that the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has placed a Russian national named Alexsey Belan on their “most wanted” list after it was discovered that this notorious hacker had gained access to, and still has in his possession, the private information of every single American who has, to date, registered their private data into what has been described as the Obamacare Healthcare Website System. 

According to this report, Belan is alleged by the FBI to have invaded the computer networks of three major United States-based e-commerce companies in Nevada and California. After hacking the systems, Belan is accused of stealing and exporting user databases with passwords to his server. Belan also allegedly negotiated the sales of the databases.

Two US federal arrests warrants have been issued for Belan in Nevada and California. In Las Vegas, Belan is charged with obtaining information from a protected computer; possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices; and aggravated identity theft. In San Francisco, Belan was charged with two fraud counts and two counts of aggravated theft of identity.
The specific e-commerce systems Belan illegally gained access to, this FSB report says, are the Covered California ™ and Nevada’s Silver State Health Insurance Exchange, both of which are linked to the Obamacare website and that all are described as being “e-commerce insurance marketplaces.”

Critical to note, this FSB report quotes a US news source, is that in the case of Belan’s hacking of the Nevada health exchange website, it had already been forewarned about, and as stated by the Nevada Journal in their 30 October article titled Nevada’s Obamacare Website Synchs With A ‘High Security Risk’ For Users and which, in part, says:
It’s official: Any personal data you give to the State of Nevada’s Obamacare website may be at risk from potential hackers and other security problems.

As Associated Press reporter Sandra Chereb reported in September, the state exchange website — “Nevada Health Link” — must synchronize your input with Obamacare’s federal “hub,” to access your personal data at the Internal Revenue Service, Social Security Administration and U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

Earlier today, however, AP reported that an “internal government memo” it had obtained revealed that administration officials were concerned that inadequate testing posed a “‘high’ security risk for President Barack Obama's new health insurance website.”
Later in the day, CNN provided such a memo, which was internal to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). “Due to system readiness issues, the SCA (security control assessment) was only partly completed,” it said. 

This constitutes a risk that must be accepted and mitigated to support the Marketplace Day 1 operations.

One of the many “security holes” Belan “exploited” in obtaining the Obamacare info, this report continues, was identified by US software tester Ben Simo who stated to the CNN News Service, “Either the developers were incompetent and did not know how to do the basic things to protect user information, or the development was so fractured that the individuals building the system didn't understand how they fit into the bigger picture.”

CNN further reports that Simo tried to report the defect as soon as he found it, but the Obamacare hotline operator referred him to law enforcement – “which was neither helpful nor relevant.”
As the Obamacare e-commerce website has now become the largest computer coding project in world history with over 500 million lines of code, the highly respected International Business Times News Service recently reported that it was a “recipe for disaster” built on a “shoestring budget” under political pressures for deadlines to be achieved, not results or security.

Even today, the FSB reports, the Obamacare website is still spewing garbled computer code at frustrated users, and even worse is now giving the private information of its users to other users, and as reported by the News Service which says: “Thomas Dougall of Columbia was going through the online registration process when he got a call from a man in North Carolina. The caller was also trying to sign up for healthcare online, but for some reason, was able to access all the information Dougall and his wife had put into the system.”

This report further states that US contractors that worked on the Obamacare website were stunned into silence when shown a clause buried in the website that has Americans agree to a “no reasonable expectation of privacy” clause concerning their personal heath information.

The Weekly Standard News Service further confirmed this shocking clause by writing: “Buried in the source code of is this sentence that could prove embarrassing: "You have no reasonable expectation of privacy regarding any communication or data transiting or stored on this information system."  Though not visible to users and obviously not intended as part of the terms and conditions, the language is nevertheless a part of the underlying code for the "Terms& Conditions" page on the site.

After creating an account on, users are asked to click an "I accept" button under some routine Terms & Conditions prohibiting unauthorized attempts to upload information or change the website.  Once users click the button, they may proceed to shop for insurance and enter detailed personal information.  However, when the Terms & Conditions page is visible, the hidden sentence mentioned above along with several others can be seen by using a web browser's "View Source" feature.”

One mitigating factor to Belan’s hacking of the Obamacare Healthcare Website System, the FSB says, was that this website was only equipped to handle only 1,100 users just one day before its 1 October launch and is still riddled with typos, Latin filler text, desperate programmer comments and disastrous architecture.

To what Belan and his hacking cohorts will do with the countless hundreds-of-thousands (and maybe millions) of Obamacare identities they have stolen, this FSB report warns, they will go to identity thief gangs in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Ireland whom the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) notified this week had already stolen over $4 billion in fraudulent tax refunds last year from the American people.

As to why the US isn’t warning its citizens using the Obamacare Healthcare Website System that their most private information is now going to Russian hackers, this report concludes, may, in fact, lie with the Washington Times News Service reporting last month about a new Obama regime training manual that suggests federal agents could now face a firing squad for leaking government secrets.

November 8, 2013 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.

miércoles, 6 de noviembre de 2013

Putin Ends NATO Missile Pact, Warns Military To “Prepare For War”

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
A sobering report prepared by the Ministry of Defense (MOD) circulating in the Kremlin today states that the 4 NATO F-16 fighter jets scrambled from Turkey hours ago to harass the Il-20 reconnaissance warplanes flying along Russia’s Black Sea coast on one their routine daily missions was in direct retaliation over President Putin’s abrupt canceling of his cooperation with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization over missile defense yesterday.

According to this report, and confirmed by the Voice Of Russia News Service, in another powerful and significant move for peace, Putin cancelled a presidential order which in 2011, had set up an interdepartmental working group under the authority of the Russian Presidential Administration designed to develop ways to establish cooperation with NATO in the sphere of “missile defense”.

Many experts and NATO watchers familiar with the decree, and the attempts by the Russian Federation to develop an equal partnership relationship with NATO on the basis of mutual respect and transparency, may now breathe a collective sigh of relief that Putin has finally run out of patience with the alliance.
This MOD report further states that Putin’s “move for peace” against the US led NATO alliance is meant to show the West that he will “retaliate in force” against what he calls US President Obama’s “insane” plan for global tyranny that is even now threatening to destroy America and the European Union.

Even more grimly, this report continues, was Putin’s ordering the strategic forces to carry out a large-scale surprise military drill last Wednesday launching four nuclear missiles that were closely monitored by US intelligence agencies that included the test launch of two land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and two submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs).

In Putin’s further “preparation for war,” this MOD report says, he also ordered this past Friday that the two Tupolev Tu-160 Blackjack strategic nuclear bombers currently visiting South America to stay on indefinite patrol should they be needed to strike the United States.
Not just Putin is gravely concerned over Obama’s war moves either, this report continues, as China this past week joined Russia in overtly threatening the United States with nuclear retaliation.
In what this MOD report calls a “war move against the US,” China last week sent a surveillance ship to Hawaiian waters for the very first time in history in an unprecedented move described as a provocative retaliation to the US naval presence in the East China Sea, publicly revealed a view of its mysterious fleet of nuclear submarines, and its state-run media revealed for the first time that its nuclear submarines can, and will, attack American cities as a means to counterbalance US nuclear deterrence in the Pacific.

Of the greatest concern to both Russia and China regarding Obama this report says, is the American Presidents purging of nearly 200 high ranking US military officers, the latest being US Army Col Eric Tilley commander of the largest American base in Japan who was fired by Obama yesterday.
US sources commenting on this unprecedented purging of these officers are warning that in Obama’s America, the military must forsake their constitutional oath in favor of blind allegiance to their new commander.

To the effect(s) Obama’s purge is having upon the US military was recently described by the WND News Service which reports:
“Retired Army Maj. Gen. Patrick Brady, recipient of the U.S. military’s highest decoration, the Medal of Honor, as well as other top retired officers, say President Obama’s agenda is decimating the morale of the U.S. ranks to the point members no longer feel prepared to fight or have the desire to win.

“There is no doubt he (Obama) is intent on emasculating the military and will fire anyone who disagrees with him” over such issues as “homosexuals, women in foxholes, the Obama sequester,” Brady told WND.
“They are purging everyone, and if you want to keep your job, just keep your mouth shut,” one source told WND.”

Even more troubling about Obama, this MOD report warns, is that he now appears to be “descending into madness” as new evidence has emerged that he has ordered US military doctors to design innovative new methods of torture to be used against his enemies, and was quoted as gleefully exclaiming to his top aides, “I'm really good at killing people”.
As to how good at “killing people” Obama has become we noted in our 21 October report titled Evidence That 5 Million Americans Have Been “Disappeared” By Obama Shocks Russia and wherein it was noted how the current US regime is actively planning on eliminating at least 25 million of their dissident citizens.

As to why the vast majority of the American people still adhere to a policy of blind obedience to a leader descending into madness, and in turn threatening to destroy their nation, the Guardian News Service warns is due to the Obama regimes unprecedented attack on press freedoms and the news gathering process in the US which the Associated Press says relies on staged propaganda photos and the Obama regime conducting secret meetings with journalists, “psych-background” sessions, in which reporters were not allowed to record, take notes, or directly attribute remarks.
And in, perhaps, the Obama regimes cruelest move against its own people, indeed the whole world, this past week the Democrat Party controlled US Senate actually passed a bill that codifies and expands NSA spying powers even as the shock of what they have done still reverberates around the globe.

So today, and as our world falls ever closer towards all-out war, one of the few voices of honesty and reason left belongs to the NSA and former CIA spy Edward Snowden who yesterday from his home in Russian exile from the brutal and despotic Obama regime told his fellow Americans… “Citizens have to fight suppression of information on matters of vital public importance. To tell the truth is not a crime.”

Sadly, Snowden’s fellow Americans will not hear these words, nor know the grave danger they are in because of the Obama regime, because they are either too blind to see, or too deaf to hear…or more than likely, both.

November 4, 2013 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.

[Ed. Note: Western governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagrees with in believing that it is every human beings right to know the truth.  Due to our missions conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ against us has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit and which is addressed in the report “Who Is Sorcha Faal?”.]

martes, 5 de noviembre de 2013

Evidence That 5 Million Americans Have Been “Disappeared” By Obama Shocks Russia

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
A shocking new report released today by the Federal Security Service (FSB) states that as many as 5 million Americans have been“disappeared” by the Obama regime during the past 4 ½ years and are presumed to be dead in the worst incident of mass genocide since the Cultural Revolution that took place in the People's Republic of China from 1966 to 1976 and claimed upwards of 20 million lives.
According to this report, a “gravely concerning statistical anomaly” in American death and missing persons records between the years of 2009-2013 was recently brought to the FSB’s attention by noted historian Boris Borisov who in 2008 revealed in his “American Holodomor” research paper that a similar genocide of these peoples took place during the Great Depression where upwards of 7 million of them were, likewise, killed.
In a previous discussion about his American Holodomor research methodology, Professor Borisov noted:
In his new research paper covering American deaths during the Obama regime, this FSB report continues, Professor Borisov relied solely upon the United States governments own statistics from the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which puts their yearly death toll at 2.5 million (Death rate: 799.5 deaths per 100,000 population) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) which lists over650,000 of these people who have gone missing each year. 
Of importance to note, Professor Borisov’s research says, is that of the over 650,000 Americans who have been reported missing each year, the United States National Crime Information Center’s (NCIC) only lists an average of 87,000 them as still active in their files per year leaving over 500,000, and again per year, unaccounted for.
Even more critical to note, Professor Borisov’s research says, is that the 799.5 deaths per 100,000 per year the United States reports is a“statistical anomaly” not supported by the facts that similar industrialized nations in the European Union (EU) [same income, same demographics, same medical care] show a much lower rate; including the UK at 683 deaths per 100,000, France at 609 per 100,000 and Germany at 657 per 100,000.
Factoring into his statistics United States census data from 2000 showing an American population of 281,421,906, and 2010 US census data showing a population of 308,745,538, and then discounting the estimated 32 million deaths and reported missing over this same time period, Professor Borisov’s research “clearly shows” a “gravely concerning statistical anomaly” that when extrapolated to today’s date (2013) leaves over 5 million Americans unaccounted for, this FSB report says.
Most dire to note, this FSB report says, is that Larry Grathwohl, the former US Army Vietnam War hero and FBI undercover agent who in the 1970’s warned the American people about the Obama genocide they would be facing, was mysteriously killed on 18 July two days after he had been contacted by Professor Borisov.
Professor Borisov’s interest in contacting the former FBI counter terror spy Grathwohl, this FSB report says was related to Grathwohl’s infiltration of the American radical left terror group Weather Underground founded by President Obama’s personal friends Bill Ayers andBernardine Dohrn.
The critical importance of Grathwohl to Professor Borisov’s research, the FSB says, can be read in the introduction to his 1976 warning book to his fellow citizens titled “Bringing Down America” and which says:
Even worse, this report continues, are that these same left-wing terrorists are also now in charge of what is known as the Obamacare plan, which if allowed to continue, Professor Borisov says, will allow the Obama regime to reach their target of killing the estimated 25 million Americans Grathwohl warned [see video HERE] the Weather Underground was prepared to sacrifice in order to remake the United States into the communist/socialistic state they have long envisioned it to be. 
To how soon the Obama regime is about to unleash even more terror upon the American people this report doesn’t say, but according to the influential American dissident Susanne Posel of it is coming much sooner than later, and who this past July warned [see video HERE] that the Obama regime “knows the collapse is coming” and “is preparing for it now.”
Are you?
October 21, 2013 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.

Datos personales